Difference between revisions of "Talk:ARChon Packager"

From Free Software Directory
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 1: Line 1:
I don't think this should get approved. After no discussion has happened for a while here, I will delete the ARChon packager page due to not meeting guidelines. Notably, from [[Free Software Directory:Requirements]]:
+
I don't think this should get approved. Notably, from [[Free Software Directory:Requirements]]:
 
"If a software program runs on proprietary operating system, then the version of the program that runs on free software operating system should be as good or better." This program is to package addons to chrome, a proprietary program. I think this would not fit in the same spirit as not guiding users to a program which works better on a proprietary operating system. Similar story at [[Talk:ARChon Runtime for Chrome]]. [[User:IanK|IanK]] ([[User talk:IanK|talk]]) 22:33, 14 October 2016 (EDT).
 
"If a software program runs on proprietary operating system, then the version of the program that runs on free software operating system should be as good or better." This program is to package addons to chrome, a proprietary program. I think this would not fit in the same spirit as not guiding users to a program which works better on a proprietary operating system. Similar story at [[Talk:ARChon Runtime for Chrome]]. [[User:IanK|IanK]] ([[User talk:IanK|talk]]) 22:33, 14 October 2016 (EDT).
  
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
:: [[User:David Hedlund|David Hedlund]]: until [[Talk:ARChon Runtime for Chrome]] issues get resolved, I don't think we should approve this, since this is used for that. [[User:IanK|IanK]] ([[User talk:IanK|talk]]) 00:36, 15 October 2016 (EDT)
 
:: [[User:David Hedlund|David Hedlund]]: until [[Talk:ARChon Runtime for Chrome]] issues get resolved, I don't think we should approve this, since this is used for that. [[User:IanK|IanK]] ([[User talk:IanK|talk]]) 00:36, 15 October 2016 (EDT)
 +
 +
:: Update: I removed mention of deleting the page.

Revision as of 15:48, 15 October 2016

I don't think this should get approved. Notably, from Free Software Directory:Requirements: "If a software program runs on proprietary operating system, then the version of the program that runs on free software operating system should be as good or better." This program is to package addons to chrome, a proprietary program. I think this would not fit in the same spirit as not guiding users to a program which works better on a proprietary operating system. Similar story at Talk:ARChon Runtime for Chrome. IanK (talk) 22:33, 14 October 2016 (EDT).

IanK Chrome extensions run on Iridium, a free and privacy enhanced version of Chromium which is based on Chrome. --David Hedlund (talk) 22:59, 14 October 2016 (EDT)
David Hedlund: until Talk:ARChon Runtime for Chrome issues get resolved, I don't think we should approve this, since this is used for that. IanK (talk) 00:36, 15 October 2016 (EDT)
Update: I removed mention of deleting the page.


Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the page “GNU Free Documentation License”.

The copyright and license notices on this page only apply to the text on this page. Any software or copyright-licenses or other similar notices described in this text has its own copyright notice and license, which can usually be found in the distribution or license text itself.