Difference between revisions of "User talk:BABA200"

From Free Software Directory
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 92: Line 92:
 
GNU should '''force''' more '''control''' over what they want to call '''GNU software''' !!!!  ('''!!!''' For now I '''refuse''' to say GNU/foo '''!!!''')
 
GNU should '''force''' more '''control''' over what they want to call '''GNU software''' !!!!  ('''!!!''' For now I '''refuse''' to say GNU/foo '''!!!''')
  
Base URLs for GNU software  [http://gnu.org/software BaseNames]:
+
Base URLs for GNU software  [http://gnu.org/software Base Names]:
  
 
: http://gnu.org/software/foo
 
: http://gnu.org/software/foo
Line 98: Line 98:
 
: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/foo
 
: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/foo
 
: http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/foo
 
: http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/foo
: http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/foo (only for the website other repositories should also have a base URL for this option)
+
: http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/foo (For the website other repositories should also have a base URL for this please seperate website and software.)
: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/foo (Some loose files and directories can go to a better place ook at the crap it is now, all the loose txt (only pointers) files can go and all NON-GNU can also leave)
+
: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/foo (look at the crap [ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/ it] is now, some loose files and directories can go to a better place all the loose txt (only pointers) files can go and all NON-GNU can also leave)
: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/foo (there has to be a better solution)
+
: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/foo ([ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/ There] has to be a better solution/name a seperate manuals section is not needed)
 
: ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/foo
 
: ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/foo
 
: http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/foo
 
: http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/foo
Line 116: Line 116:
  
  
: gnu.org/software: There are at least 10 base names listed that you wont find anywhere and there should not be a decommissioned section, GNU has to decide what it wants to list as GNU software.
+
: gnu.org/software: There are at least 10 base names listed that you wont find anywhere and there should not be a decommissioned section, GNU has to decide what it wants to list as GNU software.  
  
 
=='''Messages'''==
 
=='''Messages'''==

Revision as of 07:22, 17 March 2017

Trying to construct some ideas about the FSD

The GNU universe
http://www.gnu.org/
http://www.fsf.org/
https://savannah.gnu.org/ (https://savannah.nongnu.org/)
ftp://ftp.gnu.org/
ftp://alpha.gnu.org/
http://download.savannah.gnu.org/ (http://download.savannah.nongnu.org/)
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/ (http://web.cvs.savannah.nongnu.org/)
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/ (http://cvs.savannah.nongnu.org/)
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/ (http://git.savannah.nongnu.org/)
http://svn.savannah.gnu.org/ (http://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/)
http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/ (http://bzr.savannah.nongnu.org/)
http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/ (http://hg.savannah.nongnu.org/)
http://arch.savannah.gnu.org/
more or less:
http://puszcza.gnu.org.ua/
http://gna.org/ (!!! ENDS THIS YEAR !!!)
All entries where applicable should also have links to
This I do not specially to promote these sites. (Trisquel I would promote)
There are many reasons like verify their authenticity have them maintained/developed and promote free software.
All software should have an (or more) independent developer/maintainer. So these sites should not be their main site if could.
This way you also notice problems like pressure to maintain needed software especially Debian. (At least thats my thought)
-- Please let me know which sites to add (or remove) and other ways to promote specially GNU and High Priority. --
https://tracker.debian.org/
http://packages.trisquel.info/belenos/ (belenos = latest version)
https://metacpan.org/release/
https://pypi.python.org/pypi
https://rubygems.org/gems/
https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/
https://hackage.haskell.org/packages/
http://www.pygame.org/
http://elpa.gnu.org/packages/
https://octave.sourceforge.io/
https://wiki.gnome.org/
https://www.kde.org/applications/
not sure
http://codehaus-plexus.github.io/
http://commons.apache.org/
http://doctrine-project.org/
http://felix.apache.org/
http://gap-system.org/
http://maven.apache.org/
http://pear.php.net/
http://pecl.php.net/
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/
http://shinken.io/
http://snapframework.com/
https://trac-hacks.org/
https://wiki.lxde.org/en/Main_Page
https://www.horde.org/apps
http://windowmaker.org/
http://www.ccp4.ac.uk/
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/biomodels-main/
http://www.eclipse.org/
http://www.videolan.org/
http://xmailserver.org/
undefined
https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/
http://code.enthought.com/
http://pear.horde.org/
https://wiki.debian.org/
https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs

Usefull links found through the FSD

Usefull in the search of lost software
standard I search these:
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/
https://sourceforge.net/directory/
https://github.com/
https://archive.org/
other places:
https://launchpad.net/
https://gitorious.org/ (Download and search through (11mB): https://gitorious.org/index-list.html)
https://code.google.com/archive/p/
https://github.com/BackupTheBerlios (If found a link to berlios (also search sourceforge (not only -> https://sourceforge.net/u/berliosrobot/profile/))
http://www.ibiblio.org/catalog/
Smaller software sites
https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/
http://newbreedsoftware.com/
http://repo.cat-v.org/
http://repo.or.cz/
http://www.sourcefiles.org/

Thoughts

I think we should always promote C (which I do not know how) and Guile.

GNU should force more control over what they want to call GNU software !!!! (!!! For now I refuse to say GNU/foo !!!)

Base URLs for GNU software Base Names:

http://gnu.org/software/foo
http://gnu.org/software/foo/manual
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/foo
http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/foo
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/foo (For the website other repositories should also have a base URL for this please seperate website and software.)
ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/foo (look at the crap it is now, some loose files and directories can go to a better place all the loose txt (only pointers) files can go and all NON-GNU can also leave)
ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/foo (There has to be a better solution/name a seperate manuals section is not needed)
ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/foo
http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/foo
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/foo
http://svn.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/foo
http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/foo
http://arch.savannah.gnu.org/archives/foo
http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/lh/foo
http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/r/foo
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/foo.git
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/foo.git
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=foo.git

Extra (try it):

http://tracker.debian.org/pkg/foo


gnu.org/software: There are at least 10 base names listed that you wont find anywhere and there should not be a decommissioned section, GNU has to decide what it wants to list as GNU software.

Messages



Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the page “GNU Free Documentation License”.

The copyright and license notices on this page only apply to the text on this page. Any software or copyright-licenses or other similar notices described in this text has its own copyright notice and license, which can usually be found in the distribution or license text itself.