Free Software Foundation!

Join now

Difference between revisions of "User talk:Genium"

From Free Software Directory
Jump to: navigation,
m (scheme name for the homepage url)
Line 15: Line 15:
 
Lastly, you have been doing amazing work on the Directory and I can't thank you enough for all the updates and redirects you've been making. --[[User:Jgay|Jgay]] ([[User talk:Jgay|talk]]) 14:48, 4 October 2013 (EDT)
 
Lastly, you have been doing amazing work on the Directory and I can't thank you enough for all the updates and redirects you've been making. --[[User:Jgay|Jgay]] ([[User talk:Jgay|talk]]) 14:48, 4 October 2013 (EDT)
 
:Thankyou to point this out, I was not sure… Not sure also about my last edit, please revert the change if I am wrong. [[User:Genium|Genium]] ([[User talk:Genium|talk]]) 15:50, 4 October 2013 (EDT)
 
:Thankyou to point this out, I was not sure… Not sure also about my last edit, please revert the change if I am wrong. [[User:Genium|Genium]] ([[User talk:Genium|talk]]) 15:50, 4 October 2013 (EDT)
 +
  
 
== GNU packages and redirects ==
 
== GNU packages and redirects ==
Line 24: Line 25:
 
== ikiwiki ==
 
== ikiwiki ==
 
@Joshua: ikiwiki seems cleaner for URLs  (and much more powerful since content can be under GIT version control, but it's another question… and in an ideal world, we would have an Emacs-or-Guile-based wiki engine… but I digress :-) [[User:Genium|Genium]] ([[User talk:Genium|talk]]) 14:26, 12 January 2014 (EST)
 
@Joshua: ikiwiki seems cleaner for URLs  (and much more powerful since content can be under GIT version control, but it's another question… and in an ideal world, we would have an Emacs-or-Guile-based wiki engine… but I digress :-) [[User:Genium|Genium]] ([[User talk:Genium|talk]]) 14:26, 12 January 2014 (EST)
 
+
:Ikiwiki is nice, but, it is not nearly as powerful or featureful as the current (semantic) mediawiki set-up. --[[User:Jgay|Jgay]] ([[User talk:Jgay|talk]]) 12:47, 19 January 2014 (EST)
 
== scheme name for the homepage url ==
 
== scheme name for the homepage url ==
 
@Joshua: do you prefer the http URI scheme, or can we use https instead? [[User:Genium|Genium]] ([[User talk:Genium|talk]]) 15:05, 12 January 2014 (EST)
 
@Joshua: do you prefer the http URI scheme, or can we use https instead? [[User:Genium|Genium]] ([[User talk:Genium|talk]]) 15:05, 12 January 2014 (EST)
 +
:It probably makes sense to use https wherever we can. --[[User:Jgay|Jgay]] ([[User talk:Jgay|talk]]) 12:47, 19 January 2014 (EST)

Revision as of 12:47, 19 January 2014

Contents

Boost

Thank you for submitting Boost. I have just added it to the directory.

to-do

Added a "Core X11 runtime" section under X11 entry, not sure that is relevant here. We have to check if all related packages are free software. Genium (talk) 16:34, 16 September 2013 (EDT)

Firefox

Hi, please leave the page for Firefox as a redirect to GNU_IceCat. Firefox is not free software as it places restrictions on redistributing verbatim copies. We do not want to recommend Firefox.

But, by having Firefox redirect to GNU_IceCat it makes it so that all of the semantic relationships are done correctly. That is, if a person says that somethign is a firefox extension, then it will correctly appear listed as a GNU_IceCat extension. Without this redirect, such relationships will not work.

Lastly, you have been doing amazing work on the Directory and I can't thank you enough for all the updates and redirects you've been making. --Jgay (talk) 14:48, 4 October 2013 (EDT)

Thankyou to point this out, I was not sure… Not sure also about my last edit, please revert the change if I am wrong. Genium (talk) 15:50, 4 October 2013 (EDT)


GNU packages and redirects

Hi, I know that you make a lot of redirects. I've made a list of all GNU packages that are listed on gnu.org/software. It looks like we are pretty close to getting all of the GNU packages with a gnu.org/s/<package> URL to have a corresponding directory.fsf.org/wiki/<packagename>. Thanks so much for your work in making this happen! --Jgay (talk) 16:06, 8 January 2014 (EST)

Hi Joshua, your page is in my tool list, Thank you! I will check each entry this weekend… Genium (talk) 23:50, 8 January 2014 (EST)
Note that Mediawiki capitalizes automatically the first letter of the resource in the path, so <packagename> becomes <Packagename> in the URL, but it's not a problem because it is treated as case-insensitive, so, we can still write directory.fsf.org/wiki/gdb as we do on the GNU website: gnu.org/s/gdb. Your naming convention is much cleaner, and we have the fieldname to write the fullname (GNU Emacs for directory.fsf.org/wiki/emacs & gnu.org/s/emacs. Genium (talk) 14:09, 12 January 2014 (EST)

ikiwiki

@Joshua: ikiwiki seems cleaner for URLs (and much more powerful since content can be under GIT version control, but it's another question… and in an ideal world, we would have an Emacs-or-Guile-based wiki engine… but I digress :-) Genium (talk) 14:26, 12 January 2014 (EST)

Ikiwiki is nice, but, it is not nearly as powerful or featureful as the current (semantic) mediawiki set-up. --Jgay (talk) 12:47, 19 January 2014 (EST)

scheme name for the homepage url

@Joshua: do you prefer the http URI scheme, or can we use https instead? Genium (talk) 15:05, 12 January 2014 (EST)

It probably makes sense to use https wherever we can. --Jgay (talk) 12:47, 19 January 2014 (EST)



Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the page “GNU Free Documentation License”.

The copyright and license notices on this page only apply to the text on this page. Any software or copyright-licenses or other similar notices described in this text has its own copyright notice and license, which can usually be found in the distribution or license text itself.


Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Contribute