|
|
(57 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | == Trying to construct some ideas about the FSD ==
| + | #REDIRECT [[User_talk:Bendikker]] |
− | | |
− | ;The GNU universe:
| |
− | : http://www.gnu.org/
| |
− | : http://www.fsf.org/
| |
− | : https://savannah.gnu.org/ (https://savannah.nongnu.org/)
| |
− | : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/
| |
− | : ftp://alpha.gnu.org/
| |
− | : http://download.savannah.gnu.org/ (http://download.savannah.nongnu.org/)
| |
− | : http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/ (http://web.cvs.savannah.nongnu.org/)
| |
− | : http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/ (http://cvs.savannah.nongnu.org/)
| |
− | : http://git.savannah.gnu.org/ (http://git.savannah.nongnu.org/)
| |
− | : http://svn.savannah.gnu.org/ (http://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/)
| |
− | : http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/ (http://bzr.savannah.nongnu.org/)
| |
− | : http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/ (http://hg.savannah.nongnu.org/)
| |
− | : http://arch.savannah.gnu.org/
| |
− | :more or less:
| |
− | : http://puszcza.gnu.org.ua/
| |
− | : http://gna.org/ (!!! '''ENDS''' 2017 !!!)
| |
− | | |
− | ;All entries where applicable should also have links to:
| |
− | : This I do not specially to promote these sites. ([https://trisquel.info/ Trisquel] I would promote.)
| |
− | : There are many reasons like verify their authenticity have them maintained/developed and promote free software.
| |
− | : All software should have an (or more) independent developer/maintainer. So these sites should not be their main site if could.
| |
− | : This way you also notice problems like pressure to maintain needed software especially Debian. (At least thats my thought.)
| |
− | : -- Please '''let me know''' which sites to add (or remove) and other ways to promote specially '''GNU''' and '''High Priority'''. --
| |
− | : https://tracker.debian.org/
| |
− | : http://packages.trisquel.info/belenos/ (belenos = latest version)
| |
− | : https://metacpan.org/release/
| |
− | : https://pypi.python.org/pypi
| |
− | : https://rubygems.org/gems/
| |
− | : https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/
| |
− | : https://hackage.haskell.org/packages/
| |
− | : http://www.pygame.org/
| |
− | : http://elpa.gnu.org/packages/
| |
− | : https://octave.sourceforge.io/
| |
− | : https://wiki.gnome.org/
| |
− | : https://www.kde.org/applications/
| |
− | : not sure
| |
− | : http://codehaus-plexus.github.io/
| |
− | : http://commons.apache.org/
| |
− | : http://doctrine-project.org/
| |
− | : http://felix.apache.org/
| |
− | : http://gap-system.org/
| |
− | : http://maven.apache.org/
| |
− | : http://pear.php.net/
| |
− | : http://pecl.php.net/
| |
− | : https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/
| |
− | : http://shinken.io/
| |
− | : http://snapframework.com/
| |
− | : https://trac-hacks.org/
| |
− | : https://wiki.lxde.org/en/Main_Page
| |
− | : https://www.horde.org/apps
| |
− | : http://windowmaker.org/
| |
− | : http://www.ccp4.ac.uk/
| |
− | : http://www.ebi.ac.uk/biomodels-main/
| |
− | : http://www.eclipse.org/
| |
− | : http://www.videolan.org/
| |
− | : http://xmailserver.org/
| |
− | : undefined
| |
− | : https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/
| |
− | : http://code.enthought.com/
| |
− | : http://pear.horde.org/
| |
− | : https://wiki.debian.org/
| |
− | : https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs
| |
− | | |
− | == Usefull links found through the FSD ==
| |
− | | |
− | ;Usefull in the search of lost software
| |
− | :standard I search these:
| |
− | : https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/
| |
− | : https://sourceforge.net/directory/
| |
− | : https://github.com/
| |
− | : https://archive.org/
| |
− | :other places:
| |
− | : https://launchpad.net/
| |
− | : https://gitorious.org/ (Download and search through (11mB): https://gitorious.org/index-list.html)
| |
− | : https://code.google.com/archive/p/
| |
− | : https://github.com/BackupTheBerlios (If found a link to berlios (also search sourceforge (not only -> https://sourceforge.net/u/berliosrobot/profile/))
| |
− | ;Smaller software sites
| |
− | : http://www.ibiblio.org/catalog/
| |
− | : https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/
| |
− | : http://repo.or.cz/
| |
− | : http://www.sourcefiles.org/
| |
− | | |
− | ==Thoughts==
| |
− | | |
− | : I think we should always promote '''C''' (which I do not know how) and [http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/ '''Guile'''].
| |
− | | |
− | GNU should '''force''' more '''control''' over what they want to call '''GNU software'''. ('''!!!''' For now I '''refuse''' to say GNU/foo '''!!!''')
| |
− | | |
− | Base URLs for GNU software [http://gnu.org/software Base Names]:
| |
− | | |
− | : http://gnu.org/software/foo
| |
− | : http://gnu.org/software/foo/manual
| |
− | : http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/foo
| |
− | : http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/foo
| |
− | : http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/foo (For the website other repositories should also have a base URL for this please seperate website and software.)
| |
− | : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/foo (Look at the crap [ftp://ftp.gnu.org it] is now, some loose files and directories can go to a better place all the loose text (only pointers) files/dirs can go and all NON-GNU can also leave.)
| |
− | : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/foo ([ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/ There] has to be a better solution/name a seperate manuals section is not needed.)
| |
− | : ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/foo
| |
− | : http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/foo
| |
− | : http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/foo
| |
− | : http://svn.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/foo
| |
− | : http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/foo
| |
− | : http://arch.savannah.gnu.org/archives/foo
| |
− | : http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/lh/foo
| |
− | : http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/r/foo
| |
− | : http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/foo.git
| |
− | : http://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/foo.git
| |
− | : http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=foo.git
| |
− | Extra (try it):
| |
− | : http://tracker.debian.org/pkg/foo
| |
− | | |
− | : gnu.org/software: There are at least 10 base names listed that you wont find anywhere and there should not be a decommissioned section, GNU has to decide what it wants to list as GNU software.
| |
− | | |
− | Maillist messages about GNU software I wrote:
| |
− | : [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/directory-discuss/2017-03/msg00002.html GNU Software not on FSD]
| |
− | : [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/directory-discuss/2017-03/msg00001.html "Official GNU software" in savannah]
| |
− | : [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/directory-discuss/2017-03/msg00000.html Wrong names for gnu items?]
| |
− | | |
− | Every software entree in the FSD I treat as '''very important''' GNU software is even '''more''' important.
| |
− | | |
− | '''Only on ftp''':
| |
− | | |
− | : flex : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/flex
| |
− | : phantom : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/phantom
| |
− | : savannah: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/savannah
| |
− | :
| |
− | : alived : ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/alived
| |
− | : snprintfv: ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/snprintfv
| |
− | :
| |
− | : calc : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/calc
| |
− | : clx : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/clx
| |
− | : finger : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/finger
| |
− | : g77 : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/g77
| |
− | : ghostview: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/ghostview
| |
− | : gnufsdb : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/gnufsdb
| |
− | : gnussl : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/gnussl
| |
− | : gstep : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/gstep
| |
− | : libg++ : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/libg++
| |
− | : libobjects: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/libobjects
| |
− | : libstdc++: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/libstdc++
| |
− | : para : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/para
| |
− | : recode : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/recode
| |
− | : rx : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/rx
| |
− | : sh-utils: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/sh-utils
| |
− | : webbase : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/webbase
| |
− | : windows32api: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/windows32api
| |
− | : xmorph : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/xmorph
| |
− | : xshogi : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/xshogi
| |
− | : zlibc : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/zlibc
| |
− | | |
− | == '''What do you need to do before you be noticed?''' ==
| |
− | | |
− | Some time ago on the FSF IRC channel I asked to make someone an administrator (I mentioned early access with restricted approval rights but now full rights seems also ok) because the current administrators do not seem to review/check enough. This was the example I showed (the second revision (also the editor (someone) I meant) contains fatal mistakes but it was approved): http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Which .
| |
− | I would also like some sort of supervisor (a paid job I propose) who watch and advise unexperienced editors for example, I should also already have given the power to approve my own edits. I have edited 250 entries. At this point I will not do any edits anymore because I do not want my hard work also go to waste.
| |
− | | |
− | : [http://www.fsf.org/blogs/directory/free-software-directory-meeting-recap-for-february-17th-2017 A mentioning of the discussion]
| |
− | | |
− | =='''Messages'''==
| |