Difference between revisions of "Free Software Directory:IceCat WebExtensions (proposed)/FSD bugs issue 1"
m |
|||
| (25 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | {{Special:PrefixIndex/Free_Software_Directory:IceCat_WebExtensions_(proposed)/}} | |
| + | <br /> | ||
| + | <hr /> | ||
| + | <br /> | ||
| − | I don't know how to | + | '''How to list incomplete IceCat add-ons?''' |
| + | |||
| + | Before I started working on this issue I modified one of the templates responsible for allowing you to '''Create''' a new entry. It is now mandatory for for the "Extensions of" lists to only show entries with License related fields filled: https://directory.fsf.org/wiki?title=Template:Show&diff=prev&oldid=36951 | ||
| + | |||
| + | Lots of old entries are approved despite that they don't have '''License''' data filled, we need list them so we can unapprove them. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Then we can proceed to also include this later | ||
| + | * License copyright | ||
| + | * License verified | ||
| + | * License verified date | ||
| + | |||
| + | I've read this but still don't know how to do it: | ||
| + | * https://stackoverflow.com/questions/31027987/is-an-empty-property-query-possible-in-semantic-media-wiki | ||
| + | * https://www.semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Thread:Semantic-mediawiki.org:Community_portal/Querying_for_non-empty_values | ||
| + | ** This is not covered by SMW. You can only query for existing property values. Probably you may do a {{#if: {{{Competitor}}} | | {{#set:Competitor provided=No}} }} with the property "Competitor provided" is of data type "boolean" and then query for pages with the "No" boolean. | ||
| + | * "Been having fun with SF 2.8 (loving the empty parameter fix)" - https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension_talk:Semantic_Forms/Archive_September_to_December_2014 | ||
| + | ** I'm not seeing any text with EMPTY or UNDEFINED in https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Semantic_Forms/Version_history though. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Todo== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Test 1=== | ||
| + | I'm not sure how to implement this solution. | ||
<pre> | <pre> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <noinclude> | ||
| + | Use this template as: | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ExampleTemplate | ||
| + | |License= | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | </noinclude><includeonly> | ||
| + | The value of ExampleLicense is: | ||
| + | {{#if: {{{License}}} | [[Extension of::{{{License}}}]] | [[ExampleLicense::UNDEFINED]] }} | ||
| + | <includeonly> | ||
| + | |||
| + | </pre> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Failures== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Test 1=== | ||
| + | <pre> | ||
| + | |||
{{#ask: | {{#ask: | ||
| − | [[ | + | [[Extension of::IceCat]] |
| − | License = | + | [[License::UNDEFINED]] |
| + | |?Name= | ||
| + | |?License= | ||
}} | }} | ||
| + | |||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
| − | + | ===Test 2=== | |
| + | <pre> | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{#if: [[License::UNDEFINED]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{#ask: [[Extension of::IceCat]] | ||
| + | |?Name= | ||
| + | |?License= | ||
| + | }} | ||
| − | + | }} | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | </pre> | |
| + | ==Template== | ||
| + | This template is valid but it does not do what we want. However, we use it as a template and and it is modified from https://directory.fsf.org/wiki?title=Template:Show&action=edit | ||
| − | + | <pre> | |
| − | |||
{{#ask: | {{#ask: | ||
| Line 30: | Line 82: | ||
}} | }} | ||
| + | </pre> | ||
| − | + | Output: | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 11:02, 5 September 2017
How to list incomplete IceCat add-ons?
Before I started working on this issue I modified one of the templates responsible for allowing you to Create a new entry. It is now mandatory for for the "Extensions of" lists to only show entries with License related fields filled: https://directory.fsf.org/wiki?title=Template:Show&diff=prev&oldid=36951
Lots of old entries are approved despite that they don't have License data filled, we need list them so we can unapprove them.
Then we can proceed to also include this later
- License copyright
- License verified
- License verified date
I've read this but still don't know how to do it:
- https://stackoverflow.com/questions/31027987/is-an-empty-property-query-possible-in-semantic-media-wiki
- https://www.semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Thread:Semantic-mediawiki.org:Community_portal/Querying_for_non-empty_values
- This is not covered by SMW. You can only query for existing property values. Probably you may do a with the property "Competitor provided" is of data type "boolean" and then query for pages with the "No" boolean.
- "Been having fun with SF 2.8 (loving the empty parameter fix)" - https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension_talk:Semantic_Forms/Archive_September_to_December_2014
- I'm not seeing any text with EMPTY or UNDEFINED in https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Semantic_Forms/Version_history though.
Contents
Todo
Test 1
I'm not sure how to implement this solution.
<noinclude>
Use this template as:
{{ExampleTemplate
|License=
}}
</noinclude><includeonly>
The value of ExampleLicense is:
{{#if: {{{License}}} | [[Extension of::{{{License}}}]] | [[ExampleLicense::UNDEFINED]] }}
<includeonly>
Failures
Test 1
{{#ask:
[[Extension of::IceCat]]
[[License::UNDEFINED]]
|?Name=
|?License=
}}
Test 2
{{#if: [[License::UNDEFINED]]
{{#ask: [[Extension of::IceCat]]
|?Name=
|?License=
}}
}}
Template
This template is valid but it does not do what we want. However, we use it as a template and and it is modified from https://directory.fsf.org/wiki?title=Template:Show&action=edit
{{#ask:
[[Extension of::IceCat]]
[[License::+]]
|?Name=
|?License=
}}
Output:
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the page “GNU Free Documentation License”.
The copyright and license notices on this page only apply to the text on this page. Any software or copyright-licenses or other similar notices described in this text has its own copyright notice and license, which can usually be found in the distribution or license text itself.