Talk:LibreWolf
Nonfree
As far as I know, Librewolf is a light fork of Firefox with some config files changed. Its developers do not aim to deblob the project like GNU IceCat does. I think this entry should be deleted (or create a redirect to IceCat, like Firefox. Panos Alevropoulos (talk) 11:42, 23 September 2022 (EDT)
FSD Criterias
Is Firefox still nonfree nowadays?
To me it looks like Firefox is 100% free software according to Debian Buster copyright review of Firefox.
If we assume that Firefox is 100% free software, that raises another question: what are the exact criteria for inclusion in the Free software directory?
Only sticking to 100% free software doesn't work because it's required but not sufficient. The Free System Distribution Guidelines address this issue for instance. Else you could have 100% free software whose only purpose is to install a specific nonfree software, and that's clearly not what we want.
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the page “GNU Free Documentation License”.
The copyright and license notices on this page only apply to the text on this page. Any software or copyright-licenses or other similar notices described in this text has its own copyright notice and license, which can usually be found in the distribution or license text itself.