Difference between revisions of "Talk:Z--PeerLibrary"

From Free Software Directory
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
----
 
----
At Feb 21 0815 GMT, the maintainer responds.  <blockquote>"[...] we have a disclaimer in our LICENSE file that there might be other licenses at play we are not aware of and that users should check things for themselves if they really want assurance. We are not lawyers and cannot give our users such assurance. [...] We are not saying that we are using anything, but that we might be using something which makes it non-GPL. If somebody cares, they should verify."<blockquote> Sounds to me like they just put some CYA in there to make sure that other folks like ourselves look before they leap. Not sure how to proceed--IANAL either. --[[User:Sebboh|Sebboh]] ([[User talk:Sebboh|talk]]) 11:56, 23 February 2015 (EST)
+
 
 +
At Feb 21 0815 GMT, the maintainer responds.  <blockquote>"[...] we have a disclaimer in our LICENSE file that there might be other licenses at play we are not aware of and that users should check things for themselves if they really want assurance. We are not lawyers and cannot give our users such assurance. [...] We are not saying that we are using anything, but that we might be using something which makes it non-GPL. If somebody cares, they should verify."</blockquote> Sounds to me like they just put some CYA in there to make sure that other folks like ourselves look before they leap. Not sure how to proceed--IANAL either. --[[User:Sebboh|Sebboh]] ([[User talk:Sebboh|talk]]) 11:56, 23 February 2015 (EST)

Latest revision as of 12:57, 23 February 2015

Filed ticket with PeerLibrary devs regarding their licensing: https://github.com/peerlibrary/peerlibrary/issues/713 --Sebboh (talk) 11:56, 23 February 2015 (EST)


At Feb 21 0815 GMT, the maintainer responds.

"[...] we have a disclaimer in our LICENSE file that there might be other licenses at play we are not aware of and that users should check things for themselves if they really want assurance. We are not lawyers and cannot give our users such assurance. [...] We are not saying that we are using anything, but that we might be using something which makes it non-GPL. If somebody cares, they should verify."

Sounds to me like they just put some CYA in there to make sure that other folks like ourselves look before they leap. Not sure how to proceed--IANAL either. --Sebboh (talk) 11:56, 23 February 2015 (EST)



Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the page “GNU Free Documentation License”.

The copyright and license notices on this page only apply to the text on this page. Any software or copyright-licenses or other similar notices described in this text has its own copyright notice and license, which can usually be found in the distribution or license text itself.