User talk:BABA200

Trying to construct some ideas about the FSD

The GNU universe

http://www.gnu.org/

http://www.fsf.org/

https://savannah.gnu.org/ (https://savannah.nongnu.org/)

ftp://ftp.gnu.org/

ftp://alpha.gnu.org/

http://download.savannah.gnu.org/ (http://download.savannah.nongnu.org/)

http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/ (http://web.cvs.savannah.nongnu.org/)

http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/ (http://cvs.savannah.nongnu.org/)

http://git.savannah.gnu.org/ (http://git.savannah.nongnu.org/)

http://svn.savannah.gnu.org/ (http://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/)

http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/ (http://bzr.savannah.nongnu.org/)

http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/ (http://hg.savannah.nongnu.org/)

http://arch.savannah.gnu.org/

more or less:

http://puszcza.gnu.org.ua/

http://gna.org/ (!!! ENDS 2017 !!!)

All entries where applicable should also have links to

This I do not specially to promote these sites. (Trisquel I would promote.)

There are many reasons like verify their authenticity have them maintained/developed and promote free software.

All software should have an (or more) independent developer/maintainer. So these sites should not be their main site if could.

This way you also notice problems like pressure to maintain needed software especially Debian. (At least thats my thought.)

-- Please let me know which sites to add (or remove) and other ways to promote specially GNU and High Priority. --

https://tracker.debian.org/

http://packages.trisquel.info/belenos/ (belenos = latest version)

https://metacpan.org/release/

https://pypi.python.org/pypi

https://rubygems.org/gems/

https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/

https://hackage.haskell.org/packages/

http://www.pygame.org/

http://elpa.gnu.org/packages/

https://octave.sourceforge.io/

https://wiki.gnome.org/

https://www.kde.org/applications/

not sure

http://codehaus-plexus.github.io/

http://commons.apache.org/

http://doctrine-project.org/

http://felix.apache.org/

http://gap-system.org/

http://maven.apache.org/

http://pear.php.net/

http://pecl.php.net/

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/

http://shinken.io/

http://snapframework.com/

https://trac-hacks.org/

https://wiki.lxde.org/en/Main_Page

https://www.horde.org/apps

http://windowmaker.org/

http://www.ccp4.ac.uk/

http://www.ebi.ac.uk/biomodels-main/

http://www.eclipse.org/

http://www.videolan.org/

http://xmailserver.org/

undefined

https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/

http://code.enthought.com/

http://pear.horde.org/

https://wiki.debian.org/

https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs

Usefull links found through the FSD

Usefull in the search of lost software

standard I search these:

https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/

https://sourceforge.net/directory/

https://github.com/

https://archive.org/

other places:

https://launchpad.net/

https://gitorious.org/ (Download and search through (11mB): https://gitorious.org/index-list.html)

https://code.google.com/archive/p/

https://github.com/BackupTheBerlios (If found a link to berlios (also search sourceforge (not only -> https://sourceforge.net/u/berliosrobot/profile/))

Smaller software sites

http://www.ibiblio.org/catalog/

https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/

http://repo.or.cz/

http://www.sourcefiles.org/

Thoughts

I think we should always promote C (which I do not know how) and Guile.

GNU should force more control over what they want to call GNU software. (!!! For now I refuse to say GNU/foo !!!)

Base URLs for GNU software "Base Names":

http://gnu.org/software/foo

http://gnu.org/software/foo/manual

http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/foo

http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/foo

http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/foo (For the website other repositories should also have a base URL for this please seperate website and software.)

ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/foo (Look at the crap it is now, some loose files and directories can go to a better place all the loose text (only pointers) files/dirs can go and all NON-GNU can also leave.)

ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/foo (There has to be a better solution/name a seperate manuals section is not needed.)

ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/foo

http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/foo

http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/foo

http://svn.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/foo

http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/foo

http://arch.savannah.gnu.org/archives/foo

http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/lh/foo

http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/r/foo

http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/foo.git

http://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/foo.git

http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=foo.git

Extra (try it):

http://tracker.debian.org/pkg/foo

gnu.org/software: There are at least 10 base names listed that you wont find anywhere and there should not be a decommissioned section, GNU has to decide what it wants to list as GNU software.

Maillist messages about GNU software I wrote:

GNU Software not on FSD

"Official GNU software" in savannah

Wrong names for gnu items?

Every software entree in the FSD I treat as very important GNU software is even more important.

Only on ftp:

gnu

flex : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/flex

phantom : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/phantom

savannah: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/savannah

alpha

alived : ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/alived

snprintfv: ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/snprintfv

oldgnu

calc : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/calc

clx : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/clx

finger : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/finger

g77 : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/g77

ghostview: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/ghostview

gnufsdb : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/gnufsdb

gnussl : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/gnussl

gstep : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/gstep

libg++ : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/libg++

libobjects: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/libobjects

libstdc++: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/libstdc++

para : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/para

recode : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/recode

rx : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/rx

sh-utils: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/sh-utils

webbase : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/webbase

windows32api: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/windows32api

xmorph : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/xmorph

xshogi : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/xshogi

zlibc : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/zlibc

What do you need to do before you be noticed?

Some time ago on the FSF IRC channel I asked to make someone an administrator (I mentioned early access with restricted approval rights but now full rights seems also ok) because the current administrators do not seem to review/check enough. This was the example I showed (the second revision (also the editor (someone) I meant) contains fatal mistakes but it was approved): http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Which . I would also like some sort of supervisor (a paid job I propose) who watch and advise unexperienced editors for example, I should also already have given the power to approve my own edits. I have edited 250 entries. At this point I will not do any edits anymore because I do not want my hard work also go to waste.

A mentioning of the discussion