Difference between revisions of "User talk:BABA200"

From Free Software Directory
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 62: Line 62:
 
: I think we should always promote '''C''' (which I do not know how) and [http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/ '''Guile'''].
 
: I think we should always promote '''C''' (which I do not know how) and [http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/ '''Guile'''].
  
=='''Messages'''==
+
=='''Messages'''(will be deleted)==

Revision as of 16:33, 1 March 2017

Trying to construct some ideas about the FSD

The GNU universe
http://www.gnu.org/
http://www.fsf.org/
https://savannah.gnu.org/ (https://savannah.nongnu.org/)
ftp://ftp.gnu.org/
ftp://alpha.gnu.org/
more or less:
http://puszcza.gnu.org.ua/
http://gna.org/
All entries where applicable should have links to
This I do not specially to promote these sites. (Trisquel I would promote)
There are many reasons like verify their authenticity have them maintained/developed and promote free software.
All software should have an (or more) independent developer/maintainer. So these sites should not be their main site if could.
This way you also notice problems like pressure to maintain needed software especially Debian. (At least thats my thought)
-- Please let me know which sites to add (or remove) and other ways to promote specially GNU and High Priority. --
https://tracker.debian.org/
http://packages.trisquel.info/belenos/ (belenos = latest version)
https://metacpan.org/release/
https://pypi.python.org/pypi
https://rubygems.org/gems/
https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/
https://hackage.haskell.org/packages/
http://www.pygame.org/
https://octave.sourceforge.io/

Usefull links found through the FSD

Usefull in the search of lost software
standard I search these:
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/
https://sourceforge.net/directory/
https://github.com/
https://archive.org/
other places:
https://gitorious.org/ (Download and search through (11mB): https://gitorious.org/index-list.html)
https://code.google.com/archive/p/
https://github.com/BackupTheBerlios (If found a link to berlios (also search sourceforge (not only -> https://sourceforge.net/u/berliosrobot/profile/))
http://www.ibiblio.org/catalog/
Links from listed items which might contain more software
http://retis.sssup.it/~scordino/
http://web.archive.org/web/20001018044716/http://ulli.linuxave.net/
http://web.archive.org/web/20080925175713/http://www.dplace.com/
http://web.archive.org/web/20130412064453/http://www.easysw.com/~mike/
http://web.archive.org/web/20051229060800/http://www.efd.lth.se/~d00jkr/
http://blog.b-ark.ca/Software_Projects
http://web.archive.org/web/20150319001856/http://www.fzort.org/mpr/
http://software.schmorp.de/pkg/
http://web.archive.org/web/20060111162549/http://repos.ularx.de/
http://gringotts.shlomifish.org/
http://web.archive.org/web/20051124042556/http://firestuff.org/
https://strk.kbt.io/projects.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20080805105504/http://ambient.2y.net/leif/software/index.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20050216200438/http://frida.fri.utc.sk/~sam/
http://web.archive.org/web/20141218143128/http://jasenko.com.mk/
http://web.archive.org/web/20140711083128/http://www.bitfolge.de/download/

Thoughts

I think we should always promote C (which I do not know how) and Guile.

Messages(will be deleted)



Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the page “GNU Free Documentation License”.

The copyright and license notices on this page only apply to the text on this page. Any software or copyright-licenses or other similar notices described in this text has its own copyright notice and license, which can usually be found in the distribution or license text itself.