Difference between revisions of "User talk:Cypherpunks"
m |
m |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Just update https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Free_Software_Directory:Antifeatures and you should see all "Nonfree documentation" entries. | Just update https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Free_Software_Directory:Antifeatures and you should see all "Nonfree documentation" entries. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I reverted the name change of Gnuradio. However, I removed "Nonfree documentary" intentionally. gnuradio is a dubbed GNU package, so how can the documentation be nonfree? Richard Stallman found this disturbing so I take for granted that it is free. Can you prove that its not? --[[User:David Hedlund|David Hedlund]] ([[User talk:David Hedlund|talk]]) 12:16, 19 January 2017 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Can you please send the text that you added in https://directory.fsf.org/wiki?title=User_talk:David_Hedlund&oldid=41456 to directory-discuss@directory-discuss@gnu.org so we can talk about it with the community? --[[User:David Hedlund|David Hedlund]] ([[User talk:David Hedlund|talk]]) 13:01, 19 January 2017 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Great, the wiki is a slow interface for decision making. --[[User:David Hedlund|David Hedlund]] ([[User talk:David Hedlund|talk]]) 13:12, 19 January 2017 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 14:12, 19 January 2017
Nonfree documentation
I renamed https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Free_Software_Directory:Antifeatures#Closed_documentation to https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Free_Software_Directory:Antifeatures#Nonfree_documentation because we avoid the term "closed": https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.en.html#Closed
I updated the entries listed in https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Free_Software_Directory_talk:Antifeatures#Rationale_for_specific_project_inclusion by modifying "Closed documentation" to "Nonfree documentation" in their source. --David Hedlund (talk) 11:04, 16 January 2017 (EST)
Just update https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Free_Software_Directory:Antifeatures and you should see all "Nonfree documentation" entries.
I reverted the name change of Gnuradio. However, I removed "Nonfree documentary" intentionally. gnuradio is a dubbed GNU package, so how can the documentation be nonfree? Richard Stallman found this disturbing so I take for granted that it is free. Can you prove that its not? --David Hedlund (talk) 12:16, 19 January 2017 (EST)
Can you please send the text that you added in https://directory.fsf.org/wiki?title=User_talk:David_Hedlund&oldid=41456 to directory-discuss@directory-discuss@gnu.org so we can talk about it with the community? --David Hedlund (talk) 13:01, 19 January 2017 (EST)
Great, the wiki is a slow interface for decision making. --David Hedlund (talk) 13:12, 19 January 2017 (EST)
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the page “GNU Free Documentation License”.
The copyright and license notices on this page only apply to the text on this page. Any software or copyright-licenses or other similar notices described in this text has its own copyright notice and license, which can usually be found in the distribution or license text itself.