Difference between revisions of "User talk:IanK"
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I recommend newbies to join the FSD meetings to learn the basics and ask FSF staff questions. See here: https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Free_Software_Directory:Meetings. I am very aware of the license notices issues as I've been working for over 2 years on this wiki; we don't delete such entries, we contact the author and ask the person to add license noticies and a license file, so we can approve the entry. --[[User:David Hedlund|David Hedlund]] ([[User talk:David Hedlund|talk]]) 15:14, 15 October 2016 (EDT) | I recommend newbies to join the FSD meetings to learn the basics and ask FSF staff questions. See here: https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Free_Software_Directory:Meetings. I am very aware of the license notices issues as I've been working for over 2 years on this wiki; we don't delete such entries, we contact the author and ask the person to add license noticies and a license file, so we can approve the entry. --[[User:David Hedlund|David Hedlund]] ([[User talk:David Hedlund|talk]]) 15:14, 15 October 2016 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:David Hedlund|David Hedlund]]: Ya, actually I realized after I said that it is better not to delete it, at least not for a much longer time, like years of time. What we need is an alternate list than the "unapproved pages", if we review all of the unapproved pages and there are still hundreds of them waiting on licensing issues or other improvements before approval, then there is no list which can be used to identify what which unapproved pages actually need review. | ||
Revision as of 15:38, 15 October 2016
I get email if you post here, so go for it.
I answered https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Talk:ARChon_Packager. --David Hedlund (talk) 23:05, 14 October 2016 (EDT)
Do not delete unapproved entries, it is work from the community that need to be revised. --David Hedlund (talk) 15:03, 15 October 2016 (EDT)
I recommend newbies to join the FSD meetings to learn the basics and ask FSF staff questions. See here: https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Free_Software_Directory:Meetings. I am very aware of the license notices issues as I've been working for over 2 years on this wiki; we don't delete such entries, we contact the author and ask the person to add license noticies and a license file, so we can approve the entry. --David Hedlund (talk) 15:14, 15 October 2016 (EDT)
David Hedlund: Ya, actually I realized after I said that it is better not to delete it, at least not for a much longer time, like years of time. What we need is an alternate list than the "unapproved pages", if we review all of the unapproved pages and there are still hundreds of them waiting on licensing issues or other improvements before approval, then there is no list which can be used to identify what which unapproved pages actually need review.
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the page “GNU Free Documentation License”.
The copyright and license notices on this page only apply to the text on this page. Any software or copyright-licenses or other similar notices described in this text has its own copyright notice and license, which can usually be found in the distribution or license text itself.