Difference between revisions of "User talk:Bendikker"

From Free Software Directory
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 47: Line 47:
 
Libre.fm is not a separate package from GNU FM, it is a website that uses GNU FM. Libre FM is not a decommissioned project, all that happened was that mattl changed the name from Libre FM to GNU FM. Actually there were a few other names bouncing around as well before the name GNU FM was rather quickly finalized. You can see this is the case since GNU.org redirects your link to GNU FM, or if you were to contribute to GNU FM the assignments states that GNU FM was previously known as Libre FM among other names. If you want to update the GNU FM entry to state that it was briefly known as Libre FM, that's probably fine. But we don't need an entry for a non-existent project, and we certainly don't need to encourage people to take over maintainership of it, as mattl is maintaining it just fine under its new name. -- [[User:donaldr3|donaldr3]] ([[User talk:donaldr3|talk]]) 12:12, 6 September 2019 (EDT)
 
Libre.fm is not a separate package from GNU FM, it is a website that uses GNU FM. Libre FM is not a decommissioned project, all that happened was that mattl changed the name from Libre FM to GNU FM. Actually there were a few other names bouncing around as well before the name GNU FM was rather quickly finalized. You can see this is the case since GNU.org redirects your link to GNU FM, or if you were to contribute to GNU FM the assignments states that GNU FM was previously known as Libre FM among other names. If you want to update the GNU FM entry to state that it was briefly known as Libre FM, that's probably fine. But we don't need an entry for a non-existent project, and we certainly don't need to encourage people to take over maintainership of it, as mattl is maintaining it just fine under its new name. -- [[User:donaldr3|donaldr3]] ([[User talk:donaldr3|talk]]) 12:12, 6 September 2019 (EDT)
  
Although I do agree that this would be a waste. The problem I encounter are the many traces librefm has. https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/librefm/ does not state anything about a namechange. Look at all the mailinglists etc. I think I was right to make that entry go up again, it is not the only such. I can do the otherway around, with a decommissioned note that librefm has changed its name. --[[User:Bendikker|Bendikker]] ([[User talk:Bendikker|talk]]) 12:50, 6 September 2019 (EDT)
+
I guess the problem I have with it is the reuse of the identifier librefm. --[[User:Bendikker|Bendikker]] ([[User talk:Bendikker|talk]]) 12:50, 6 September 2019 (EDT)

Revision as of 12:59, 6 September 2019

Standard links I add for GNU packages

https://my.fsf.org/donate/ ( unless other exists )

https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-system-discuss/

When Decommissioned also than in the details section:

If you have time and interest in resurrecting this GNU package, please contact: mailto:maintainers@gnu.org.

Standard links I add

https://www.fsf.org/resources/service/ ( unless other exists )

When a project is on Savannah:

https://savannah.gnu.org/people/

Standard reference links I add

Standard reference links may not all be the same so remove if its not related. When sorted out remove (Ref) (R) and (R) from Savannah.


https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/

https://metacpan.org/release/

https://pypi.org/project/

https://rubygems.org/gems/

https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/

https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/ and https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/


(You may remove contents from this page when obsolete if nothing is left make this page only text: Gone!! )

Why didn't you move the page?

You redirected the page https://directory.fsf.org/wiki?title=IceCat&diff=75283&oldid=75096 instead of moving it and leaving a redirect. That screws up the revision history so why did you do that? --David Hedlund (talk) 10:24, 9 April 2019 (EDT)

gnuzilla is the identifier for gnuzilla and also icecat, that is somewhat problematic, what is gnuzilla is not very clear. --Bendikker (talk) 12:12, 4 September 2019 (EDT)

requested pages have been approved

I restored and approved the requested pages. thanks : ) -- Sudoman (talk) 12:55, 5 September 2019 (EDT)

Libre.fm

Libre.fm is not a separate package from GNU FM, it is a website that uses GNU FM. Libre FM is not a decommissioned project, all that happened was that mattl changed the name from Libre FM to GNU FM. Actually there were a few other names bouncing around as well before the name GNU FM was rather quickly finalized. You can see this is the case since GNU.org redirects your link to GNU FM, or if you were to contribute to GNU FM the assignments states that GNU FM was previously known as Libre FM among other names. If you want to update the GNU FM entry to state that it was briefly known as Libre FM, that's probably fine. But we don't need an entry for a non-existent project, and we certainly don't need to encourage people to take over maintainership of it, as mattl is maintaining it just fine under its new name. -- donaldr3 (talk) 12:12, 6 September 2019 (EDT)

I guess the problem I have with it is the reuse of the identifier librefm. --Bendikker (talk) 12:50, 6 September 2019 (EDT)



Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the page “GNU Free Documentation License”.

The copyright and license notices on this page only apply to the text on this page. Any software or copyright-licenses or other similar notices described in this text has its own copyright notice and license, which can usually be found in the distribution or license text itself.